This transformation groks a limited subset of RDF:
  -- just one level of nesting (no Description/typedNodes
     as values of properties)
  -- properties are sorted by subject, collected
     in a Description element for that subject
  -- rdf:ID is not used; only rdf:about
  -- only absolute URIs are used

Arbitrary RDF can be converted to this form using
	  cwm --rdf foo.rdf --bySubject --base=bogus: > foo-limited.rdf

see Semantic Web Area for Play
for details about cwm.
Dan Connolly
$Id: rdf2dot.xsl,v 1.1 2002/11/29 15:01:05 areggiori Exp $
/* transformed by by */ digraph { =" "; subgraph } " " [ =" ", ]; propertyElt in nodeElt: subj: pred: is an EdgeProperty. A given property might be used to make edges in one graph and not in another; so EdgeProperty(p) isn't well-defined those p's. It seems that edge-ness is a function of the graph and the property; i.e. a relation between them. So EdgeProperty is deprecated... use hasEdgeProperty. @@oops... what about g:style, g:label, etc... should those be a function of the property and the graph? Or should we have edgeLabel and nodeLabel properties? Hmm... is an EdgeProperty. A given property might be used to make edges in one graph and not in another; so EdgeProperty(p) isn't well-defined those p's. It seems that edge-ness is a function of the graph and the property; i.e. a relation between them. So EdgeProperty is deprecated... use hasEdgeProperty @@oops... what about g:style, g:label, etc... should those be a function of the property and the graph? Or should we have edgeLabel and nodeLabel properties? Hmm... maybe my:graph g:nodeType my:Marbles; g:edgeType my:GEdgeProp; g:labelProp my:label; g:styleProp my:styleProp; EdgeProperty: pred: obj: " " -> " " [ /* edge attributes */ =" ", ];